The Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) disseminates risk tools and supplies information for risk assessment activities. Taking advantage of searchable and executable databases, menu-driven queries, and data downloads using the latest Web technologies, the RAIS offers essential tools and information for the risk assessment process. The RAIS is applicable to diverse users, as most tools can be tailored to meet site-specific needs. More information about the RAIS can be found in the 2023 technical memorandum available here.
This tutorial is designed to assist the user in understanding and applying available RAIS tools to the risk assessment process. You will be guided through a focused case study that will demonstrate how to utilize many of the tools and information available on the RAIS. Specifically, this tutorial will assist in:
Before beginning this tutorial, a brief overview of risk assessment is provided in the mini tutorial What is Risk Assessment? Additional risk assessment guidance can be found using the links under the Guidance dropdown.
For more hands-on guidance, the RAIS team offers training courses with guided practice sessions. Information on upcoming training can be found here or by selecting the training icon on the RAIS .
The RAIS system undergoes frequent changes to keep all its information up to date. Users can review changes on the What’s New page or subscribe to receive email updates here.
There are a few notes to keep in mind when using the RAIS:
The RAIS Document Search tool allows users to search for
risk assessment guidance, chemical or radionuclide-specific information, results from previous investigations, and more.
The RAIS Glossary includes environmental restoration terms with definitions from DOE-ORO Environmental Restoration/Waste Management
Risk Assessment Program staff and affiliates and other sources.
Changes to toxicity values, physicochemical parameters, ecological screening benchmarks, and ARARs are generally updated
throughout the year with a focus on the semiannual updates in May and November. The What’s New page provides monthly updates as far back as February 1996. A key benefit of this feature is to inform users of updates that may
impact ongoing risk assessments (e.g., revised toxicity values).
General questions may be submitted through:
For additional guidance, see a list of commonly asked questions from users on the Frequently Asked Questions page (also available by selecting the following link at the top right of each page.
The following hypothetical example is presented to illustrate how the RAIS tools are used in a chemical risk assessment.
An industrial area upstream of Site A has accidentally released contaminants into the nearby stream. This stream is classified for domestic, fish and aquatic life, recreational, and irrigation uses. At Site A, there is a residential community that uses the stream for domestic household uses; they also occasionally catch and eat the fish from this stream. Surface water and fish samples were taken from the stream at Site A, and the results of the chemical analyses are provided in the data set below for use in this example.
Table 1. Example Data Set for Site A:
Analyte | CASRN | Detection Frequency |
Maximum Detected Concentration |
Units | Detection Medium |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arsenic | 7440-38-2 | 3/4 | 1.3 | µg/L | Surface Water |
Carbon tetrachloride | 56-23-5 | 4/4 | 0.85 | mg/kg | Fish |
Toluene | 108-88-3 | 2/4 | 4.3 | µg/L | Surface Water |
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- | 71-55-6 | 2/4 | 12,600 | µg/L | Surface Water |
Guidance for comparing background data to site-related contaminant data is provided in the Guidance for Conducting Risk Assessments and Related Risk Activities for the DOE-ORO Environmental Management Program (BJC/OR-271), Appendix C. This background comparison guidance has been consistently used for the Oak Ridge Reservation; however, you should consult with your Regional Program Manager and appropriate Stakeholders before the background screen is performed to determine the appropriate method for your site.
THe RAIS contains four options for background screening:
USelect “Background Values” from the Chemical Tools menu; then select "Oak Ridge Background", “Portsmouth Background”, or “Paducah Background”. The Results page will either display a table(s) of background values or references/links to background source documents.
Before performing an ARARs screen, be sure to check with your regulators (e.g., EPA Region IV does not perform the ARARs screen as part of the baseline human health risk assessment). Some states may only require that the ARARs for the detected analytes be reported in the remedial investigation report. Risk assessors should consult with appropriate regulatory agencies to determine which, if any, ARARs to screen against and the appropriate selection criteria based on the water body classification.
If you plan to use criteria from any of the 13 states offered in the RAIS ARAR Search tool, check the state webpages for the original sources of the ARARs, in case there have been recent updates. Links to health and environmental agencies for U.S. States and Territories can be found here.
Comparing ARAR results (Table 2) to the data set (Table 1) shows that the maximum detected concentration for toluene is below the ARAR, therefore we could eliminate toluene from further risk assessment steps. However, for the purposes of this tutorial and because of state guidance variance that may require ARAR comparisons be performed at a different stage in the remedial investigation process, we will assume that none of the contaminants are screened out at this stage.
Table 2: Chemical ARAR Screen Federal Source
Analyte | CASRN | Primary Drinking Water MCLs (µg/L) | Primary Drinking Water MCLGs (µg/L) | Proposed Primary Drinking Water MCLs (µg/L) | Proposed Primary Drinking Water MCLGs (µg/L) | Secondary Drinking Water SMCLs (µg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arsenic, Inorganic | 7440-38-2 | 10 | 0 | |||
Carbon Tetrachloride | 56-23-5 | 5 | 0 | |||
Toluene | 108-88-3 | 1000 | 1000 | |||
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- | 71-55-6 | 200 | 200 |
Table 2: Chemical ARAR Screen Federal Source (cont.)
Analyte | CASRN | Human Health WQC for Aquatic Organisms and Drinking Water (µg/L) | Human Health WQC for Aquatic Organisms Only (µg/L) | Federal Freshwater WQC - Maximum (µg/L) | Federal Freshwater WQC - Continuous (µg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arsenic, Inorganic | 7440-38-2 | 0.018 | 0.14 | 340 | 150 |
Carbon Tetrachloride | 56-23-5 | 0.23 | 1.6 | ||
Toluene | 108-88-3 | 1300 | 15000 | ||
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- | 71-55-6 |
Because the risk-based PRGs in the database were developed to protect human health, they may not be adequately protective of nonhuman receptors. For sites where risk-based PRGs for ecological receptors are required, the RAIS provides the ecological benchmarks tool and the ecological benchmark user guide.
After screening against ARARs, the next step is to screen the data from Table 1 against the risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs). To learn more about PRGs, refer to the Chemical PRG Calculator User Guide, which presents specific PRG Equations for each land use. PRGs can be calculated using the Chemical PRG Calculator, available under the Chemical Tools menu.
As a reminder, we will generate PRGs based on an example hypothetical situation concerning a stream at Site A contaminated with arsenic, carbon tetrachloride, toluene, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane. Nearby residents drink water and eat fish from the stream. Surface water and fish samples have been collected for a baseline risk assessment.
Please note that the session inputs for the PRG calculator can be saved for future use and recalled by the PRG calculator. Instructions for saving the session inputs and accessing them later are included in this section.
In the case of our hypothetical stream contamination situation, our next step for the baseline risk assessment would be to select the most protective (lowest value) of the cancer and noncancer PRGs for screening. The selected PRGs would then be compared against the relevant maximum detected analyte concentrations from Site A in Table 1.
The PRG results for the tap water and fish exposure mediums are listed in the two tables below, with orange shading indicating the selected (most protective) PRG (Tables 3 and 4). Calculations were performed on July 11, 2023.
Table 3: Resident Chemical Preliminary Remediation Goals for Tap Water
Table 4: Resident Chemical Preliminary Remediation Goals for Fish
As seen in Table 4, the fish exposure medium automatically generates two sets of PRGs: one for the fish concentration and one for surface water concentration associated with fish ingestion. No surface water samples associated with fish ingestion samples were collected in our example scenario, therefore the Surface Water-Fish PRGs will not be used.
Using the Site A data set (Table 1), the maximum detected concentrations (MDC) for surface water for each analyte are compared against the selected tap water PRGs; the MDCs for fish for each analyte are compared against the fish PRGs. For sample concentrations that are below the PRGs, those contaminants do not need to be carried forward in the baseline risk assessment. Otherwise, the analytes would be considered COPCs. The summary of the PRG screening is shown in Table 5, where pink-shading indicates that the maximum detected concentration exceeds the PRG. As can be seen in Table 5, all analytes except toluene will be considered COPCs and will move forward in the baseline risk assessment, where risks will be calculated for the residents at Site A.
Table 5: Comparison of Chemnical Sample Data to PRGs
The RAIS includes two methods for assessing risks associated with non-residential exposures to lead and soil: the Adult Lead Model (ALM) risk calculator and the ALM PRG calculator. The methodology focuses on estimating fetal blood lead concentrations in women exposed to lead-contaminated soils. This approach also provides tools for evaluating risks of elevated blood lead concentrations among exposed adults.
The Adult Lead Soil PRG Calculator can be used to determine whether lead is present at a level that may pose an unacceptable risk to human health. Review the default exposure parameters used in the calculations, which can be changed if evaluating a site-specific scenario. The PRG will be automatically calculated and shown in the blue cell.
The Adult Lead Soil Risk Calculator calculates the probability (risk) of the fetal blood lead concentration exceeding target blood levels by determining the fetal blood lead level concentration from the user-provided soil lead concentration.
The Chemical Groundwater Transport Calculator recreates the migration pathway of contaminants from soil to groundwater by calculating the expected groundwater concentration from user-provided soil concentrations. Parameters can be adjusted prior to exporting the results. Unlike other tools on the RAIS, the Chemical Groundwater Transport Calculator only considers the Resident receptor. The Resident is expected to be the most conservative option and therefore protective of other receptors.
For more information on the soil to groundwater pathway, see Section 4.9 of the Chemical Risk Calculator User Guide.
There are multiple types of PEFs that can be calculated based on the exposure scenario at hand. The Chemical PEF Transport Calculator guides the user through the calculation of the following PEFs:
For more information on these PEF types, see sections 4.10.1 through 4.10.3 of the Chemical Risk Calculator User Guide.
The VF, like PEF, is an inhalation variable that has different methods of calculation. The VF Transport Calculator guides the user through the calculation of the following:
For more information on these VF types, see sections 4.10.4 through 4.10.7 of the Chemical Risk Calculator User Guide.
The RAIS chemical toxicity and parameter tools provide a variety of information that can be used to either calculate risks or hazards (e.g., cancer slope factors and reference doses, respectively).
The RAIS has four methods for obtaining chemical information:
The Chemical Toxicity Values tool provides human health toxicological values for multiple chemicals simultaneously. The following toxicological values for chemicals (as well as their associated references) are available in the RAIS Chemical Toxicity Values tool:
The toxicity values for each chemical are chosen based on the EPA OSWER Directive 9285.7-53 (EPA, 2003), which describes the recommended hierarchy of toxicity value sources. See section 2.3.2 of the Chemical PRG Calculator User Guide for more information.
The Chemical Toxicity Metadata tool provides toxicity values as well as supporting information, such as target organs and details of the studies that produced the toxicity values, for the following:
The toxicity values for each chemical are chosen based on the EPA OSWER Directive 9285.7-53 (EPA, 2003), which describes the recommended hierarchy of toxicity value sources. See section 2.3.2 of the Chemical PRG Calculator User Guide for more information.
The Chemical Data Profiles tool provides basic information, toxicity values, and chemical-specific parameters (e.g., volatilization factor) for a selected chemical. The unique aspect of the RAIS Chemical Data Profiles tool is that data is displayed from a variety of federal, state, and other sources. While the Chemical Toxicity Values and Chemical Toxicity Metadata tools provide toxicity values based on the EPA hierarchy of toxicity values, the Chemical Data Profiles tool shows all available toxicity values and indicates which values are used in the calculators.
The Chemical-Specific Parameters Search tool provides chemical-specific parameters for multiple chemicals simultaneously.
For this tutorial, we will continue the example hypothetical situation with a contaminated stream at Site A. Nearby residents drink water and eat fish from the stream. After the PRG screening step, we were left with three COPCs for risk characterization: arsenic, carbon tetrachloride, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane.
In the case of our hypothetical stream contamination situation, our next step for the baseline risk assessment would be to evaluate the risk calculator outputs and determine next steps. The risk results (excess lifetime cancer risk [ELCR] and noncancer hazard results) and percent contribution to total risk results are summarized and reproduced below for each medium and exposure pathway. Calculations were performed June 19, 2023.
Table 6: Summarized Chemical Risk Results and Percent Contribution to Total - Tap Water
Table 7: Summarized Chemical Risk Results and Percent Contribution to Total - Fish
The results are color-coded to identify risk ranges and potential contaminants of concern, as explained below:
Hazard Range (defined as “Hazard Index [HI]” or “Hazard Quotient [HQ]”):
- HQ or HI < 0.1: No shading
- HQ or HI > 0.1: Purple
- HQ or HI > 1: Blue
Risk Range (ELCR):
- Risk < 0.000001 (1E-06): No shading
- Risk > 0.000001 (1E-06): Orange
- Risk > 0.0001 (1E-04): Red
- Risk > 0.01: Black
For individual contaminants, an HI above 1 is generally believed to pose a noncancer effect, while an ELCR above 1E-05 is generally believed to pose a cancer risk. For the example Site A scenario, the risk calculator results indicate that all three contaminants are potential COCs. Carbon tetrachloride poses a slight concern for cancer risk for a lifetime consumption of fish, and the tap water results show that arsenic and 1,1,1-trichlorethane pose a significant cancer risk and noncancer effect to residents who use the stream for drinking water and household purposes.
More information about the chemical risk calculator result output can be found in Section 2 of the Chemical Risk Calculator User Guide.
The following example will be used for the Radionuclide tools in this tutorial. Due to worker concerns, a company has decided to investigate a recently bought office building situated at Site B known to have some historical radionuclide contamination. Site B is a 0.5-acre (2000 m2) site in Phoenix, AZ that will be staffed with indoor workers who will be exposed to soil and groundwater. Soil and groundwater samples were taken from Site B, and the results of the analyses are provided in the data set below for use in this tutorial.
Table 8. Data Set for Site B
Radionuclide | Detection Frequency |
Maximum Detected Concentration |
Units | Detection Medium |
---|---|---|---|---|
Am-241 | 3/4 | 2 | pCi/g | Soil |
Co-60 | 2/4 | 0.2 | pCi/g | Soil |
Ra-226 | 4/4 | 30 | pCi/L | Groundwater |
Tc-99 | 2/4 | 90 | pCi/L | Groundwater |
For, radionuclide background concentrations, please see the "Background Values" tool under the Radionuclide Tools dropdown menu.
Guidance for comparing background data to site-related contaminant data is provided in the Guidance for Conducting Risk Assessments and Related Risk Activities for the DOE-ORO Environmental Management Program (BJC/OR-271), Appendix C. This background comparison guidance has been consistently used for the Oak Ridge Reservation; however, you should consult with your Regional Program Manager and appropriate Stakeholders before the background screen is performed to determine the appropriate method for your site.
THe RAIS contains four options for background screening:
Please note that selecting “Background Values” under the Radionuclide Tools dropdown menu opens the same Chemical Background Tool pages, due to the limited range of analytes with Generic Background Values.
USelect “Background Values” from the Radionuclide Tools menu; then select "Oak Ridge Background", “Portsmouth Background”, or “Paducah Background”. The Results page will either display a table(s) of background values or references/links to background source documents.
Before performing an ARARs screen, be sure to check with your regulators (e.g., EPA Region IV does not perform the ARARs screen as part of the baseline human health risk assessment). Some states may only require that the ARARs for the detected analytes be reported in the remedial investigation report. Risk assessors should consult with appropriate regulatory agencies to determine which, if any, ARARs to screen against and the appropriate selection criteria based on the water body classification.
If you plan to use criteria from any of the 13 states offered in the RAIS ARAR Search tool, check the state webpages for the original sources of the ARARs, in case there have been recent updates. Links to health and environmental agencies for U.S. States and Territories can be found here.
Few radionuclides are listed in ARARs, with the notable exceptions being tritium, radium, and uranium. Because of this, selecting “ARAR Search” from the Radionuclide Tools menu will bring you to the same page found under the Chemical Tools dropdown menu.
Because the risk-based PRGs in the database were developed to protect human health, they may not be adequately protective of nonhuman receptors. For sites where risk-based PRGs for ecological receptors are required, the RAIS provides the Ecological Benchmarks Tool for Radionuclides and the Ecological Benchmark User Guide.
After screening against ARARs, the next step is to screen the data from Table 8 against the risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs). Radionuclide PRGs are calculated by selecting the applicable radionuclide(s) together with the applicable media, land use, and exposure route combination.
Radionuclide PRGs are generated on the RAIS by using the Radionuclide PRG Calculator. To learn more about the PRGs, refer to the Radionuclide PRG Calculator User Guide, which presents specific PRG Equations for each land use.
This section uses the example Site B to generate PRGs. Site B is a 0.5-acre (2000 m2) office building in Phoenix, AZ staffed with indoor workers exposed to soil and groundwater contamination.
Please note that the session inputs for the PRG calculator can be saved for future use and recalled by the PRG calculator. Instructions for saving the session inputs and accessing them later are included in this section.
In the case of our hypothetical radionuclide contamination scenario, our next step for the baseline risk assessment is to compare the PRGs against the relevant maximum detected concentrations (MDCs) from Site B, as presented in Tables 9 and 10. Calculations were performed July 21, 2023.
Table 9: Comparison of Soil Sample Data to PRGs (Radionuclide)
Table 10: Comparison of Tap Water Sample Data to PRGs (Radionuclide)
Any sample concentrations below the PRGs do not need to go forward in the baseline risk assessment. Otherwise, the analytes would be considered Radionuclides of Potential Concern (ROPCs). As can be seen in Tables 9 and 10, all radionculides except Am-241 will be considered ROPCs and move forward in the baseline risk assessment, where risks will be calculated for the workers at Site B.
The radionuclide media transport tools include the Radionuclide Groundwater Transport Calculator and the Radionuclide PEF Transport Calculator. There is no VF transport calculator for radionuclides, as most radionuclides are metals. The RAIS team has developed a separate Radon Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (RVISL) calculator for the EPA.
The Radionuclide Groundwater Transport Calculator recreates the migration pathway of contaminants from soil to groundwater by calculating the expected groundwater concentration from user-provided soil concentrations. Parameters can be adjusted prior to exporting the results. Unlike other tools on the RAIS, the Radionuclide Groundwater Transport Calculator only considers the Resident receptor. The Resident is expected to be the most conservative option and therefore protective of other receptors.
For more information on the soil to groundwater pathway, see Section 4.9 of the Radionuclide Risk Calculator User Guide.
There are differents PEFs that can be calculated based on the exposure scenario at hand. The Radionuclide PEF Transport Calculator guides the user through the calculation of the following PEFs:
For more information on these PEF types, see Sections 4.10.1 through 4.10.3 of the Radionuclide Risk Calculator User Guide.
The RAIS radionuclide toxicity and parameter tools include:
The SFs are updated values from Federal Guidance Report (FGR) 13 supplement (EPA, 1999) using the ICRP 107 decay data (ICRP, 2008). The derivation and values are in “Calculations of Slope Factors and Dose Coefficients” (ORNL, 2014). More information about the slope factors can be found in Section 2.3 of the Radionuclide Risk Calculator User Guide.
Radionuclide dose conversion factors, also known as dose coefficients, are used alongside SFs for radionuclide calculations. The dose conversion factors from ICRP 107 are updated values from FGR 13 supplement (EPA, 1999) using ICRP 107 decay data (ICRP, 2008). The derivation and values are in “Calculations of Slope Factors and Dose Coefficients” (ORNL, 2014). The dose conversion factors from ICRP 30 can be found in FGR 11 (EPA, 1988), and the dose conversion factors from ICRP 60 can be found in FGR 12 (EPA, 1993).
The radionuclide parameters shown in this tool follow the hierarchy of parameter sources explained in Section 2.4.2 of the Radionuclide Risk Calculator User Guide.
Radionuclide risks are calculated by selecting ROPCs together with the applicable media, land use, and exposure route combination. Equation and exposure parameters used for the calculations can be found in the Radionuclide Risk Calculator User Guide.
For this tutorial, we will continue the example hypothetical situation involving exposure to radionuclides at an office building (Site B). Site B is a 0.5-acre (2000 m2) site in Phoenix, AZ that will be staffed with indoor workers who will be exposed to soil and groundwater. After the PRG screening step, we were left with three ROPCs: Co-60, Ra-226, and Tc-99 (see Tables 9 and 10 in Module 7).
For the hypothetical radionuclide contamination scenario, the next step for the baseline risk assessment would be to evaluate the risk calculator outputs and determine next steps. The total soil and total tap water risks, as well as percent contribution to total risk results, are summarized and reproduced below for each medium and exposure pathway.
Table 11: Summarized Radionuclide Risk Results for Soil
Table 12: Summarized Radionuclide Risk Results for Tap Water
The risk results are color coded to identify risk ranges and potential radionuclides of concern (ROCs):
Risk Range:
The risk calculator results indicate that all three contaminants may be ROCs. More information about the output of the radionuclide risk calculator can be found in Section 2 of the Radionuclide Risk Calculator Users Guide.
After the risk assessement steps are complete, the user must document the risk assessment process. The purpose for documentation is to:
- Determine if additional action is necessary at the site,
- Provide a basis for determining residual chemical levels that are adequately protective of public health,
- Provide a basis for comparing potential health impacts of various remedial alternatives, and
- Help support selection of the "no-action" remedial alternative, where appropriate.
The EPA has published guidance for documentation purposes entitled "Risk Assessment Guidance For Superfund (RAGS): Volume 2 Human Health Risk Evaluation - Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk Assessments". This guidance provides standardized tables for presentation of all risk results, including COPCs, background, ARARs, toxicity values, toxicity information (e.g., critical effects, target organs, uncertainty factors), excess lifetime cancer risks, hazard indices, and chemicals of concern (COCs). Check with your Regional Program Manager, Stakeholders, and state regulatory agencies to see if this guidance is applicable to your site.
In general, the risk assessment documentation includes sections/chapters containing the following: introduction, data evaluation, exposure assessment, toxicity assessment, risk characterization, summary of risks, conclusions, and remedial goal options. The RAGS Part D guidance standardizes the format of the tables presented within each of these sections of the risk assessment report/documentation.
EPA, 1988. Federal Guidance Report No. 11: Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion, And Ingestion. EPA 520-1-88-020. Office of Radiation Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., September.
EPA, 1993. Federal Guidance Report No. 12: External Exposure to Radionuclides in Air, Water, and Soil. EPA 402-R-93-081. Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., September.
EPA, 1999. Federal Guidance Report No. 13: Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclides. EPA 402-R-99-001. Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., September.
EPA, 2003. Human health toxicity values in Superfund risk assessments. OSWER Directive 9285.7-53. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., December 5.
ICRP, 2008. Nuclear Decay Data for Dosimetric Calculations. ICRP Publication 107. Ann. ICRP 38 (3). https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20107.
ORNL, 2014. Calculation of Slope Factors and Dose Coefficients. ORNL/TM-2013/00. Center for Radiation Protection Knowledge, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.